Price History
@damage has 2 recorded on-chain sales across 39 total auction events. Its peak sale was 1,570 TON (about $2,273).
| Sale price | Winning bid placed | Buyer |
|---|---|---|
| 1,570 TON≈ $2,273 | Jan 30, 2025 | 0:1cf2...f2f8 |
| 569 TON≈ $823.8 | Jun 29, 2023 | 0:713c...c347 |
How the Auction Played Out
The most recent auction for @damage drew 34 bids from 8 distinct wallets over 3 days.
Bidding opened at 2 TON and reached 1,570 TON, 785.0 times the opening bid, with a largest single raise of 200 TON.
@damage has sold 2 times on-chain: 569 TON on Jun 29, 2023, and most recently 1,570 TON on Jan 30, 2025, up 176% between its first and latest recorded sale.
Bid Activity
The last 12 recorded bids on @damage. Every row is an on-chain transaction.
| Bid | Placed | Bidder |
|---|---|---|
| 1,570 TON | Jan 30, 2025 | 0:1cf2...f2f8 |
| 1,515 TON | Jan 30, 2025 | 0:c703...4699 |
| 1,500 TON | Jan 30, 2025 | 0:1cf2...f2f8 |
| 1,444 TON | Jan 30, 2025 | 0:c703...4699 |
| 1,414 TON | Jan 30, 2025 | 0:8511...0605 |
| 1,400 TON | Jan 30, 2025 | 0:c703...4699 |
| 1,325 TON | Jan 30, 2025 | 0:8511...0605 |
| 1,222 TON | Jan 30, 2025 | 0:c703...4699 |
| 1,204 TON | Jan 30, 2025 | 0:8511...0605 |
| 1,192 TON | Jan 30, 2025 | 0:14e0...939b |
| 1,180 TON | Jan 30, 2025 | 0:d33f...eee6 |
| 1,111 TON | Jan 30, 2025 | 0:14e0...939b |
About This Name
- Length: 6 characters
- Type: 6-character all-letters name
- Market rank: #5,261 of 383,187 names by recorded peak sale
Comparable Sales
Similar names (6-character, same character style) with recorded sales.
| Username | Peak sale | Last sold |
|---|---|---|
| @danbao | 1,583,948 TON | Feb 7, 2026 |
| @devil | 555,555 TON | Oct 27, 2025 |
| @casino | 400,000 TON | Nov 2, 2022 |
| @hotels | 350,000 TON | Nov 3, 2022 |
| @pizza | 346,000 TON | Nov 17, 2022 |
| @xinqun | 300,000 TON | Feb 7, 2026 |
Watch @damage
Get alerted once a scheduled check confirms this name goes to auction, its price moves, or it becomes claimable.
NameSniper is not affiliated with Telegram or Fragment. Prices reflect public TON blockchain records and may not include every sale (names sold through other flows may carry no readable on-chain price). Historical prices are facts about past transactions, not valuations or predictions. TON amounts are exact on-chain values; any USD figure is an approximate cached conversion.